<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The World of UV Phototherapy by Chris Cane &#187; MF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/index.php/tag/mf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uvbnarrowband.com</link>
	<description>A blog by Chris Cane, the UVGuy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<div id="tw_follow_like"><iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/follow_button.html?screen_name=UVPhotoTherapy&show_count=false&lang=it" style="width:300px; height:20px;"></iframe></div>	<item>
		<title>UVB NB vs PUVA Treatment for Mycosis Fungoides.</title>
		<link>http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/index.php/2010/01/uvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/index.php/2010/01/uvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTCL Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycosis Fungoides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UVB Narrowband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/?p=1017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full article publication is entitled &#8220;Efficacy of narrowband UVB vs. PUVA in patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides.&#8221; prepared by Ponte P, Serrão V, Apetato M. at the Department of Dermatology, Hospital dos Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal. &#8230; <a href="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/index.php/2010/01/uvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full article publication is entitled &#8220;Efficacy of narrowband UVB vs. PUVA in patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides.&#8221; prepared by Ponte P, Serrão V, Apetato M. at the Department of Dermatology, Hospital dos Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.</p>
<p>Abstract:</p>
<address>Introduction Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a non-Hodgkin&#8217;s T-cell lymphoma of the skin that often begins as limited patches and plaques with slow progression to systemic involvement. Narrowband ultraviolet (UV) B therapy has been proven to be an effective short-term treatment modality for clearing patch-stage MF. The effect of psoralen plus long-wave ultraviolet A (PUVA) in the treatment of patch- and plaque-type MF has also been thoroughly documented. Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of narrowband UVB and PUVA in patients with early-stage MF. Methods We analysed the response to treatment, relapse-free survival and irradiation dose in 114 patients with histologically confirmed early-stage MF (stage IA, IB and IIA). Results A total of 95 patients were treated with PUVA (83.3%) and 19 with narrowband UVB (16.7%). With PUVA, 59 patients (62.1%) had a complete response (CR), 24 (25.3%) had a partial response (PR) and 12 (12.6%) had a failed response. Narrowband UVB led to CR in 12 (68.4%) patients, PR in 5 (26.3%) patients and a failed response in 1 (5.3%) patient.</address>
<address></address>
<address></address>
<address>There were no differences in terms of time to relapse between patients treated with PUVA and those treated with narrowband UVB (11.5 vs. 14.0 months respectively; P = 0.816). No major adverse reactions were attributed to the treatment. Conclusions Our results confirm that phototherapy is a safe, effective and well-tolerated, first-line therapy in patients with early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, with prolonged disease-free remissions being achieved. </address>
<address></address>
<address></address>
<p> <br />
<address>It suggests that narrowband UVB is at least as effective as PUVA for treatment of early-stage MF. </address>
Share and Enjoy:<a rel="nofollow"   href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F&amp;t=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides." ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/facebook.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F&amp;title=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides.&amp;bodytext=The%20full%20article%20publication%20is%20entitled%20%22Efficacy%20of%20narrowband%20UVB%20vs.%20PUVA%20in%20patients%20with%20early-stage%20mycosis%20fungoides.%22%20prepared%20by%C2%A0Ponte%20P%2C%20Serr%C3%A3o%20V%2C%20Apetato%20M.%20at%20the%20Department%20of%20Dermatology%2C%20Hospital%20dos%20Capuchos%2C%20Centro%20Hospitalar%20de%20L" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/digg.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="Digg" alt="Digg" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://twitter.com/home?status=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides.%20-%20http://bit.ly/dT8V1f" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/twitter.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/index.php/feed/" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/rss.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="RSS" alt="RSS" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F&amp;title=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides." ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/stumbleupon.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="StumbleUpon" alt="StumbleUpon" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F&amp;title=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides.&amp;notes=The%20full%20article%20publication%20is%20entitled%20%22Efficacy%20of%20narrowband%20UVB%20vs.%20PUVA%20in%20patients%20with%20early-stage%20mycosis%20fungoides.%22%20prepared%20by%C2%A0Ponte%20P%2C%20Serr%C3%A3o%20V%2C%20Apetato%20M.%20at%20the%20Department%20of%20Dermatology%2C%20Hospital%20dos%20Capuchos%2C%20Centro%20Hospitalar%20de%20L" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/delicious.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="del.icio.us" alt="del.icio.us" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&amp;bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F&amp;title=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides.&amp;annotation=The%20full%20article%20publication%20is%20entitled%20%22Efficacy%20of%20narrowband%20UVB%20vs.%20PUVA%20in%20patients%20with%20early-stage%20mycosis%20fungoides.%22%20prepared%20by%C2%A0Ponte%20P%2C%20Serr%C3%A3o%20V%2C%20Apetato%20M.%20at%20the%20Department%20of%20Dermatology%2C%20Hospital%20dos%20Capuchos%2C%20Centro%20Hospitalar%20de%20L" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/googlebookmark.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="Google Bookmarks" alt="Google Bookmarks" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F&amp;title=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides.&amp;source=The+World+of+UV+Phototherapy+by+Chris+Cane+A+blog+by+Chris+Cane%2C+the+UVGuy.&amp;summary=The%20full%20article%20publication%20is%20entitled%20%22Efficacy%20of%20narrowband%20UVB%20vs.%20PUVA%20in%20patients%20with%20early-stage%20mycosis%20fungoides.%22%20prepared%20by%C2%A0Ponte%20P%2C%20Serr%C3%A3o%20V%2C%20Apetato%20M.%20at%20the%20Department%20of%20Dermatology%2C%20Hospital%20dos%20Capuchos%2C%20Centro%20Hospitalar%20de%20L" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/linkedin.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" /></a><a rel="nofollow"   href="http://www.friendfeed.com/share?title=UVB%20NB%20vs%20PUVA%20Treatment%20for%20Mycosis%20Fungoides.&amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvbnarrowband.com%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2Fuvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides%2F" ><img src="http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/pro/images/komodo/32/friendfeed.png" class="sociable-img sociable-hovers" title="FriendFeed" alt="FriendFeed" /></a><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uvbnarrowband.com/index.php/2010/01/uvb-nb-vs-puva-treatment-for-mycosis-fungoides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

