As unbelievable as it may sound, CIGNA insurance took a major step backwards last month following AETNA’s lead (in 2004) to stop paying claims for patients with Vitiligo. Aetna stopped in 2004 for home phototherapy systems and last month CIGNA hit with both barrels and stopped covering Vitiligo for UVB Narrow Band Home Users and also for in-clinic UVB NB Therapy. I find it absolutely incredulous that a company can take such a giant step backwards.
CIGNA actually have the balls to say that Vitiligo is a cosmetic problem and not worthy of insurance coverage! What a load of crap!
The new policy can be found at http://uvbnarrowband.com//wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Cigna_Insurance_Coverage_2010.pdf. This is a true shame.
IN CLINIC PHOTOTHERAPY
Page 2 of 13
CIGNA does not cover phototherapy, photochemotherapy or excimer laser therapy for the treatment of localized or generalized vitiligo in any setting because such treatment is considered cosmetic and not medically necessary. Services that are cosmetic are not covered under most benefit plans.HOME PHOTOTHERAPY
Page 8 of 13 says Not Medically Necessary/Cosmetic/Not Covered for E0691 through E0694 which are the HCPCS codes used by insurance firms for UV Phototherapy Products used in the home.They seem to be quite emphatic.
All I can say is that this is a huge step backwards for folks with Vitiligo. Their earlier policy’s did cover Vitiligo!
.jpg)
This is completely horrendous. I currently have Cigna and am in the middle of therapy. I don’t know what I’m going to do. I just feel like crying now. I am even more appalled that they would call it a cosmetic condition.
Hi Angie. We don’t understand why CIGNA has taken this backward step. AETNA did teh same thing in 2004 and stopped covering UVB NB for home use. I updated the posting above to make the link to the CIGNA document work properly. See http://uvbnarrowband.com//wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Cigna_Insurance_Coverage_2010.pdf
Regards
Chris